Tuesday, October 26, 2010

I Think I'm Getting the Fear

Fall break is over (sadly), but I did use the opportunities of no classes and no work to my advantage and re-watched some of the great classics stowed away in my DVD collection. One of these was the complete mind-warp Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas. The movie, starring Johnny Depp and Benecio del Toro as well as a hodgepodge of other celebrity cameos, is a really intense story about two men who basically go to Vegas and spend the next several days in a illegal-drug-induced haze. The trailer from Youtube is below, but I should warn you that there's some adult material (mainly drug use, but hey you've been warned):



As disturbing and somehow equally hilarious as the movie is, though, the book is even more so. It did make one of my lists from my troublemaking post, for the explicit and gratuitous drug use and the chaos that follows. But it still ranks pretty high on the list of my all-time favorite books. I will admit that I first learned about the book only because I had watched the movie, which I had only watched because Johnny Depp was in it.

Yet between the two, the book is my favorite. I managed to find it one day in a secondhand bookstore (where it was buried in the journalism section), bought it without a second thought, and went home to devour it immediately. Fear and Loathing is one of the few books I've read where I spent nearly every page laughing because everything was so comically unbelievable. And thanks to one book, I was introduced to one of my all-time favorite authors, Hunter S. Thompson.

I want to be able to call Thompson my journalism idol, particularly for his unique Gonzo style where the writer becomes the subject and where the journalism almost becomes fiction. Thompson pushed the boundaries of his writing every single day wherever he worked (but especially Rolling Stone) and made quite the impression on nearly everyone who ever met him. That much is obvious from the numerous stories told in the oral biography Gonzo: The Life of Hunter S. Thompson, which was edited by Thompson's own RS editor Jann Wenner (check out the NY Times review for the book here). But Thompson was way into drugs and alcohol to really prove himself as a good role model, so I scratch his name off my list of role models.

Anyway...back to Fear and Loathing. There's been disagreement on whether the movie is a good interpretation of the original story, but I really have no opinion on that because I'm partial to both the movie and the book for different reasons. So instead, I thought I would share some interesting trivia about both that only a sometimes-obsessive fanatic would know.

Courtesy of The London Telegraph
Trivia Fact #1: Johnny Depp, who plays Thompson's autobiographical Raoul Duke in the movie, lived in Thompson's basement for four months to better imitate the journalist. Also, Depp's entire wardrobe throughout the movie consisted of Thompson's own clothing from the Seventies, and the red convertible you can barely see in the photo at the right is also Thompson's own '71 Chevrolet Impala

Courtesy of zuguide.com
Trivia fact #2: In the first twenty minutes of the movie, we already see our first celebrity cameo, and it's fairly unexpected. Check it out at left and see if you recognize him (this one's hopefully kinda obvious). In case you can't, probably due to the bad picture, it's Tobey Maguire pre-Spiderman days with a really bad hairdo (I think I've read somewhere it's a wig). And it's impossible to tell from this photo, but Maguire's shirt has a caricature of Mickey Mouse that is identical to the one found on the same character's shirt in Ralph Steadman's original illustration for the story.

Screenshot taken from Youtube.com
Trivia Fact #3: Okay, this one really has nothing to do with the book, but it's still entertaining. When Depp and del Toro's characters go to the Circus Circus Casino (called the Bazooka Circus Casino in the movie), they pass by this statue. According to Johnny Depp, this same gorilla now "lives" in his front yard. (Which is interesting because in the book, Duke and his companion Dr. Gonzo contemplate and even buy a gorilla off some guy while they're in Circus Circus.)



Okay, I could go on and on about either the book or the movie because I love them both. But I should probably stop while I'm ahead and leave this discussion where it is. If you're wondering where I get most of this stuff, all the facts I mentioned above, as well as more entertaining trivia, can be found on IMDB's site for the movie.

So if you're looking for whacked-out, and hilarious yet disturbing entertainment, then you have to check out Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas. (Just read the book first, trust me.)  And if you have read the book or seen the movie already, tell me your thoughts about it.

Thursday, October 14, 2010

Sometimes I wish there was a real-life 'like' button.

What's on your mind? Just saw an amazing movie...wait a minute...


Oops. Wrong website. Let me write myself a reminder: THIS IS NOT MY FACEBOOK PAGE.


Sorry, but after seeing The Social Network earlier this week, I have Facebook on the brain too much. I thought I was bad before seeing the movie, but it's somehow worse now.


And by the way, the movie's awesome. You should totally go see it. (Peter Travers of Rolling Stone did give it his first 4-star rating of the year in his recent review.) In case you haven't seen the trailer yet or just need your fix until you can go see the movie in theaters, here's the trailer:



Sadly, though, I already knew some of the storyline before I went to see the actual movie. Not just what I'd seen on the trailers and what I'd read on the Internet. No, I'd already read most of the story in this June 2008 article from Rolling Stone, which was published not long after all of the lawsuits involving Zuckerberg and Facebook were reconciled.


Even though I specifically try to avoid reviews for any movie I want to see, I must admit that I did read a couple for The Social Network (especially Peter Travers' in Rolling Stone, but that was his fault, not mine) as well as several articles about the cast.


For instance, this article on Yahoo! Movies discusses how two different bodies but the same face played the Winklevoss twins who sued Facebook founder Zuckerberg for ripping off their idea.  WorstPreviews.com has a story about Andrew Garfield's future stint as the starring role in the 2010 reboot of the Spider-Man franchise.


But the article that threw me for a loop is this one from Yahoo! Buzz. It doesn't help that it has no picture of Rooney Mara nor does it give any information of what movies the actress has acted in before. So I went into the movie with no idea of who she was or if I'd even seen her in another movie.

Imagine my surprise, then, when I finally recognized her, about ten minutes after her character's initial appearance and then abrupt departure from the opening scene, as Nancy from the 2010 Nightmare on Elm Street remake (which was actually pretty good, despite my dislike for remakes and the movie's lack of the original's Johnny Depp character Glen). So Rooney goes from the high school student Nancy terrorized by the infamous Freddy Kreuger to Zuckerberg's (most likely) fictional ex-girlfriend who was the ultimate catalyst in the founding of Facebook. Check out the picture below with her and Jesse Eisenberg as Zuckerberg:

(Courtesy of heyuguys.co.uk)


I don't know about you guys, but I'm already dying to see it again. But I'm curious: Are you eager to see The Social Network? Or are you indifferent? (Either way, I make no judgments!)


   

Monday, October 4, 2010

A Rant to Encourage Troublemaking

Okay, I know this post is now a little outdated, but I have to say something important.

I hate banned books. Or, better yet, the idea of banning books. I think it is one of the dumbest things a person can do. And sorry to say, I won't agree with anyone who says otherwise, no matter how good of an argument they give me. I will never, never advocate banning books. Or burning them either, but that's a different topic.

Last week, I felt like I was totally sticking it to the MSU professor who wanted to ban Kurt Vonnegut's Slaughterhouse-Five and two other books from Republic's school district's libraries. It was sad, really, how defiant I felt for reading Slaughterhouse-Five for my Theory and Practice class that same week.

Not to mention last week was the American Library Association's Banned Books Week. So in a little-late tribute to the 28th Banned Books Week, I've made up two lists: a) Books that Never Should be Banned, and b) Banned/Challenged Books that Shouldn't Have Been.  List (a) is mainly for laughs, but List (b) will be my serious attempt at arguing against the banning of books.

So here it goes...

Books that Never Should be Banned

Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas by Hunter S. Thompson
Courtesy of Amazon.com
   
 This journalism/fiction work (don't even ask how that works--it's too complicated to go into now) is a shining example of why you should never combine a trip to Vegas and an entire arsenal of illegal drugs.  (The movie is also a great example of why Johnny Depp should never be bald or wear a dinosaur tail; also too complicated to explain...)

2666 by Roberto BolaƱo
Courtesy of Amazon.com
 The middle third of this book in particular is a gruesome example of how truly twisted, evil, and sadistic some people can be. The world isn't all sunshine and candy.

The Harry Potter series by JK Rowling
Courtesy of Amazon.com

 If this series is banned from school libraries, how else are American kids supposed to learn what "snogging" is?

American Psycho by Brett Easton Ellis

Courtesy of Amazon.com
  Just like 2666, this book shows us how messed-up some people are. But be warned: If you're looking for the same message with a lot less gore and violence, just watch the movie. It's still pretty bad but nowhere as horrifying as the book, which managed to make this list of The 10 Most Disturbing Books of All Time.

The Divine Comedy by Dante Alighieri
Courtesy of Amazon.com
Come on, now, shouldn't everyone have access to the road map of Hell and Purgatory just in case they need to know how to get out?

Shutter Island by Denis Lehane
Courtesy of Amazon.com
Trust me, the book is even better than the movie (which was pretty hard to top, in my opinion). And everyone needs a good look at a twisted insane asylum, especially one of which Leonardo DiCaprio was given free range.

Gravity's Rainbow by Thomas Pynchon
Courtesy of Amazon.com 
I'm nowhere near close to even finishing this book for Theory and Practice, and already I can see why some people would probably want to ban this book. Nevertheless, students need a good book to pick up and read...and reread...and reread...and still be confused.

Banned/Challenged Books that Shouldn't Have Been
To Kill a Mockingbird by Harper Lee
Courtesy of Amazon.com  
This American classic is often banned for profanity and racial slurs, but the often-overlooked fact is that the profanity and racial slurs were common to the era and region in which the story takes place. Besides, it's more of a growing-up story rather than a story that, according to the Warren, Indiana, school district which banned it in 1981, "represents institutionalized racism under the guise of good literature."

The Catcher in the Rye by JD Salinger
Courtesy of Amazon.com   
One of the most infamous banned books of all time, The Catcher in the Rye is almost always banned for its use of gratuitous profanity and because some parents consider Holden Caulfield a bad influence. But truthfully, most of the music and artists these days use more profanity and are worse role models than Holden ever did or was.

Fahrenheit 451 by Ray Bradbury
Courtesy of Amazon.com 
Fahrenheit 451, regardless of the profanity and graphic language used, is banned because eventually the Christian Bible is burned. But one of my favorite blog posts ever points out something important about Fahrenheit 451: "It's an entire novel about the future government banning (and burning) books because they could inspire critical thought." Now that, ladies and gentlemen, is what you call ironic.

The Adeventures of Tom Sawyer and The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn by Mark Twain
Courtesy of Amazon.com
Even though they're technically two books, Tom Sawyer and Huck Finn got mashed together in this list because they are usually banned for the same reasons: the use of the much-frowned-upon "n" word (you know which one I mean), and Tom and Huck aren't proper role models for youngsters. Never mind that The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn is considered one of the best examples of anti-racism literature ever written.
 
Of Mice and Men by John Steinbeck
Courtesy of Amazon.com
This one is also commonly banned or challenged because of profanity as well as racial and religious slurs. Again, though, none of those seem a legitimate reason for banning a book.

Slaughterhouse-Five by Kurt Vonnegut
Courtesy of Amazon.com
There are so many reasons people argue this book should be banned that I don't even know where to begin. So I'm not even going to attempt listing them all. The MSU professor, however, recently claimed that the book "contains so much profane language, it would make a sailor blush with shame." (You can read Professor Scroggins's original Letter to the Editor here.)

1984 by George Orwell
Courtesy of Amazon.com
According to this list from the ALA, 1984 was challenged in 1981 because it was considered "pro-communist and contained explicit sexual matter." But it also provides an excellent insight to the future of what the world might become if we let Big Brother take over.

The Diary of a Young Girl by Anne Frank
Courtesy of Amazon.com
 This one is challenged more than it is banned, but most under claims that it contains too many sexual references and that it is too depressing for young adults to read. But I, and plenty of other people, believe that the book is an important depiction of the desperation faced by hundreds of thousands of the Nazis' victims.
Brave New World by Aldous Huxley
Courtesy of Amazon.com
In 1980, Brave New World was actually banned from a school district right here in Missouri because some parents believed "it made promiscuous sex look like fun" (also from ALA's list of commonly banned/challenged books). But this book is similar to 1984; both books offer disturbing views of what could happen thanks to an oppressive government.

The Great Gatsby by F. Scott Fitzgerald
Courtesy of Amazon.com
This one is also commonly banned for profanity and sexual references. Still not legitimate reasons to ban a book, especially an American classic like this one (And one of my all-time favorites).

Reviewing this list, I find it entertaining that some of my very favorite books make the second list: To Kill a Mockingbird, The Great Gatsby, and The Catcher in the Rye. Maybe I just like being a troublemaker, at least in the eyes of people dumb enough to attempt to ban books.

But at the same time, I find I have to agree with Dr. Fuller's response to Scroggins's Letter to the Editor.
So go on, be a troublemaker and check out a banned book. Even if it's not Banned Books Week anymore.